Baby Driver (2017)

I'm a fan of Edgar Wright's work, but Baby Driver was a movie that caught me by surprise.  Judging from the advertising alone, I was convinced it was a generic heist movie, and thought nothing more of it.  After a while, I kept hearing more and more about how great it was, and finally decided to see for myself.  I was pleasantly rewarded for taking that chance, and will never doubt Edgar Wright again.
Baby Driver centers itself around the tale of a young, yet gifted getaway driver (played by Ansel Elgort) who calls himself Baby, appropriately enough.  While he enjoys driving, Baby wants to escape his secret life of crime after one last job, but his boss Doc (Kevin Spacey) is intent on keeping him under his thumb.  As the story progresses, Baby falls for Deborah, a local waitress (Lily James), which causes trouble for just about everyone.
I make no exaggeration when I say that this film will likely be studied by future film students.  There are some incredible stunt driving sequences, whip smart dialogue, a delightful attention to colour, and some of the best editing I've seen on screen in a long time.
These elements alone are enough to make Baby Driver a classic, but the soundtrack is what will solidify it into your memory.  Baby is a character with a deep connection to music, and as such, there is barely a moment that goes by that isn't punctuated with some sort of music.  This isn't simply music for music's sake, either.  It's clear that this soundtrack was very carefully curated, and has enough variety to suit any taste in music.  The songs featured range from The Beach Boys to Young MC to Simon and Garfunkel, and not one feels out of place.  The songs serve to enhance the action as well as add some extra emotional context for the characters.
Speaking of character, Baby Driver has a wealth of talent from start to finish.  Ansel Elgort's acting is reserved, but perfectly attuned to the other personalities in this film.  It helps that this rising star has some excellent backup in the supporting cast.  Lily James plays a perfect girl next door, with Eiza Gonzalez as Darling, her criminal opposite.  Jon Hamm plays the mercurial Buddy, who steals a fair number of scenes with his simmering performance.  Finally, Kevin Spacey ties everything together as the fatherly and tyrannical crime boss.
With Baby Driver, Edgar Wright has combined eye-popping action, an impressive soundtrack and an extremely memorable cast to make a film that will be remembered long after it's gone from the big screen.   

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (2017)

The movie that got us all 'hooked on a feeling' in 2014 is back!  This time around Peter 'Star Lord' Quill (Chris Pratt) and friends find themselves on the run from a golden-skinned race known as the Sovereigns after they discover a small theft by Rocket (Bradley Cooper).  During the chase, they are rescued by a mysterious man known as Ego (Kurt Russell) who reveals himself to be Peter's father.  The Guardians are invited to his home planet, where we discover his surprising motivations for searching out his son.  Meanwhile, Yondu (Michael Rooker) and his space-pirate crew the Ravagers have fallen on hard times, resulting in an internal power struggle.  Eventually Yondu's crew catches up with the Guardians, but by this time, their situation has changed dramatically.  Banding together for the greater good, the Guardians, along with Yondu and Nebula (Karen Gillan) face off against an unexpected villain in a fight that will determine the safety of the entire galaxy!
As is expected with any Marvel film, Guardians Vol 2 is full of eye candy, from the excellent makeup to the outstanding visual effects.  Thankfully, the quality of writing is just as good as the effects.  Every character gets a good amount of screen time.  Peter and Gamora (Zoe Saldana) continue their indecisive attempts at romance, Rocket and baby Groot (Vin Diesel) get numerous chances to explode people, and Drax (Dave Bautista) begins to understand the nature of love, as well as having some of the funniest moments in the movie.  I also appreciate that this sequel put a spotlight on the 'villains' from the first instalment, giving them some very complex new depth of character.
It would be irresponsible of me to talk about a Guardians film without discussing the soundtrack.  Once again, the music is made up of various hits and one-hit-wonders of the disco era, but something about this soundtrack doesn't feel quite the same.  It still has some very well chosen songs for the big moments, but overall, it doesn't seem nearly as vibrant or memorable as the first movie.  After some reflection, I think this has something to do with the context of the first film.  Guardians of the Galaxy started from a deep emotional place, which imprints itself on an audience very strongly.  As well, the first film was our introduction to these characters we now love, so those musical moments become even more ingrained in our unconscious, much in the same way we associate John Williams's Imperial March with Darth Vader, for instance.
As is the case with any Marvel movie, there is a small collection of post-credit sequences.  A few of them are chuckle-worthy, but unless you're well-versed in Marvel comics lore, there's not much worth sticking around for.
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 is full of action, laughs and adventure.  But more than this, it has a serious emotional story to tell.  Ultimately, it's a story about family.  We don't get to choose our relatives, but we do get to choose who we call our family.  Guardians explains this to us in a very clear and poetic way, and is a big reason I think it improves on the original.  If you're a fan of the original, or just like Marvel movies in general, I highly recommend you see this while it's still in theatres!

Chain Reaction (1996)

This film was selected via Movie-O-Matic!

In Chain Reaction, a team of university students discover a revolutionary source of clean energy.  Unfortunately, the discovery is leaked, and the tech is stolen after the murder of the project's leader.  The murder is pinned on the gifted young student Eddie Kasalivich (Keanu Reeves) and his fellow scientist Dr. Lily Sinclair (Rachel Weisz).  The two fugitives soon uncover that the murder and theft came from within the project itself, orchestrated by Dr. Paul Shannon (Morgan Freeman) for personal corporate gain.  The two fight for their lives while trying to put the real criminals behind bars.
It's interesting that Chain Reaction still feels timely, even after twenty odd years.  While the technology used on screen is now dated, the themes of environmentalism and corporate greed are arguably even more relevant today.  Sadly, the ideas presented in this film are a little better than the product itself.
Rachel Weisz gives a decent performance, but not one that's particularly memorable.  Even the presence of renowned actor Morgan Freeman doesn't bring much to the table.  His Paul Shannon character delivers a few villainous monologues, and spends the remainder of the film chewing on a cigar.  This is an action filled movie, which works to the advantage of Keanu Reeves, who does best when he doesn't have to talk much.  Unfortunately, the action isn't all that satisfying.  One could argue that the apparent clumsiness of the lead characters is because they're just average, non-athletic science students, but it looks a lot more like sloppy film making to me.  This is especially disappointing considering this movie was directed by Andrew Davis, who is better known for films like The Fugitive and Under Siege, both of which are better than Chain Reaction.
Despite all of its flaws, I can't bring myself to say that Chain Reaction is bad movie.  Maybe it's my soft spot for the 90s, but I can see a certain appeal to this movie.  I also think it did reasonably well at the box office in its time, for what it's worth.  So, if you're a Keanu Reeves fan, or are just looking for a VHS era movie you might have missed, Chain Reaction is worth a look.      

Kong: Skull Island (2017)

Produced by the same team who brought us Godzilla (2014), Kong: Skull Island is an interesting retelling of the Kong story that brings the iconic monster into a more contemporary setting.  Set during the end of the Vietnam war, alternative researchers Bill Randa (John Goodman) and Houston Brooks (Corey Hawkins) petition the government to fund an expedition to an uncharted island, which they believe contains a secret, primeval ecosystem, never seen by man.  To get there, they are granted a military escort, headed by Colonel Preston Packard (Samuel L. Jackson).  Together with a skilled tracker (Tom Hiddleston) and an outspoken political photojournalist (Brie Larson), they all set off into the mysterious unknown.  Upon their arrival, the group are faced with the dangerous wildlife of Skull Island (not including Kong himself) as well as Hank Marlow (John C. Reilly), who has befriended the natives since being stranded on the island since World War II.  While fighting to survive the destruction of Kong, the team desperately try to reach their arriving rescue team, and escape the dangers of Skull Island.
The thing I like most about Kong: Skull Island is how modern the story feels.  Even though it is set in the 1970s, this take on the story feels fresh in a way that Peter Jackson's version didn't.  There is no mention of New York City here, and many of the other typical Kong tropes are absent.  The film doesn't completely abandon all reference to its origins, however.  There are still a few subtle and not-so-subtle nods to the source material, which I thought were smartly used.  While we're on the subject of theming, this film borrows as much from classic Vietnam movies as much as it does the Kong franchise.  There are many notes from films like Apocalypse Now and Rambo, though but not so many that the movie feels derivative.
I also appreciate the way Skull Island gives the monsters plenty of room to play.  This is a huge contrast with 2014's Godzilla, which did a reasonably good job, but spent too much time with the dull human characters narrating the big monster action fans had paid to see.  The visuals of the film are top notch, with some very creative and memorable creature designs.
My only complaint about the cast is it was perhaps a little too large for everyone to get equal screen time.  There were a few characters I would have liked to see more of, but the various plot threads only allowed for a certain amount of storytelling.  For instance, while Tom Hiddleston may have top billing, I found his character ultimately forgettable.  Of the other players involved, I particularly enjoyed Samuel L. Jackson's intense performance as  Col. Packard.  Being a career military man, Packard has no problem with a new assignment, and decides to start his own personal war with Kong, which results in nothing but trouble for everyone else.  John Goodman is also excellent as Bill Randa, a man who knows for a fact monsters are real, and is eventually proven right.  My praises of the cast wouldn't be complete without the mention of John C. Reilly.  His performance as the grizzled, slightly crazed Hank Marlow steals the show, and is one of the most memorable of the whole movie.
Kong: Skull Island breathes some new life into the old bones of the Kong franchise, and is a great modern interpretation of a classic story.

*There is a small post-credits scene which hints at some possible future films, so make sure to stick around after the show!    

Rogue One (2016)

Rogue One is the latest entry into the Star Wars canon.  It begins with the story of Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones), daughter of Imperial scientist Galen Erso (Mads Mikkelsen).  Imperial forces appear at the Erso home to coerce Galen into continuing his work on the Death Star.  Jyn escapes and is sent into hiding, watched over by Galen's trusted friend, Saw Gererra (Forest Whitaker).   Years later, she is rescued from Imperial arrest by Captain Cassian Andor (Diego Luna) and K-2SO (voiced by Alan Tudyk), a reprogrammed Imperial droid.  Jyn is taken to meet the rest of the Rebellion soldiers, but doesn't want to get involved.  If she is able to find Saw Gererra, who is now a dangerous political extremist, the Rebellion will consider the debt repaid.  This leads Jyn to a fateful meeting with Saw, in which she discovers her father was, in fact, a Rebel sympathizer, and has built a flaw into the Death Star, the new super weapon of the Galactic Empire.  Banding together with a few other Imperial deserters and outcasts, the new team disobeys Rebellion orders and follows this trail to the planet Scarif, where they begin a guerilla operation to steal the Death Star plans and make sure the Rebellion has them before it's too late for the galaxy.  

One of the notable elements of Rogue One is that it doesn't begin with the standard Star Wars prologue text crawl.  I think this is appropriate, as Rogue One a different sort of movie.  It has much more in common with a classic war movie than any chapter of the Star Wars saga.  The presence of the Death Star throughout the movie reinforces the feeling that no one is safe, and that the Empire has the upper hand in the situation.  Even as a fan, knowing how things would eventually end up, watching Rogue One was an emotional experience.  The characters are all likable in different ways, and it's almost difficult to watch certain scenes, as you don't want to see any of them harmed. 

Each member of the cast brings their own interestingly distinct character to life on screen.  Felicity Jones does very well in the role of Jyn Erso, a woman struggling to trust others, as well as come to terms with her father's actions.  Forest Whitaker is also very memorable as the mercurial and dangerous Saw Gererra.  In addition the the great heroes Rogue One provides, there are also the classic villains of the Star Wars franchise.  James Earl Jones returns as Darth Vader, but I was most impressed with another returning character.  In an astounding feat of movie magic, effects team ILM brought Grand Moff Tarkin (the late Peter Cushing) back to the screen.  While some have complained about this use of effects, I initially thought it was an incredible makeup job rather than CGI effects.  Of course, Tarkin has always been one of my favourite minor Star Wars characters, so perhaps I'm biased.  The next down the Imperial chain of command is new character Orson Krennic (Ben Mendelsohn).  I found his character a little puzzling.  While Krennic does show anger and a thirst for power, he doesn't really cut an impressive figure next to the likes of Darth Vader or even Tarkin.  At times, Krennic looks rather incompetent, although, perhaps that's the whole point.  In any case, it's a minor complaint and doesn't spoil the film for me.

Rogue One is big and exciting, like any Star Wars movie.  The difference is in the serious atmosphere the story creates.  The Jedi mysticism we've seen before is not visible here, replaced by the blood and smoke of warfare.  While it may not be for everyone, I found Rogue One to be a welcome departure from the familiar structure Star Wars has built.

Die Hard (1988)

November is a strange time for a movie viewer.  Halloween has passed, so it doesn't feel quite right to watch horror films.  On the other hand, it's a little to early to watch the traditional Christmas films.  What I like to do during this time is watch movies that are set during Christmas, but don't have a direct connection to the holiday season.  For me, no movie better exemplifies this idea than Die Hard.
In Die Hard, we are introduced to John McClane (Bruce Willis).  John is a hard working NYPD cop, and is visiting Los Angeles to see his estranged wife Holly (Bonnie Bedelia), who has signed on with the Nakatomi Corporation.  The night John arrives, Nakatomi is holding their Christmas party at Nakatomi Plaza, their new (and partially unfinished) office building.  Before John can have a proper discussion and reconcile with his wife, Nakatomi Plaza is taken over by a group of German terrorists led by the cold and calculating Hans Gruber (Alan Rickman).  Interestingly, this isn't a typical hostage situation.  Gruber and his team are really after the valuable contents of Nakatomi's vault.  When he's left separated from the hostages, John McClane does his best to stop the terrorists while the LAPD sits on their thumbs and media crews scramble to get the story.  McClane does have a little help from the outside in the form of beat cop Al Powell (Reginald VelJohnson), the only cop who believes John isn't a threat.  Unlike many other action films, Die Hard is smartly written, and has its share of insightful dramatic dialogue in between the explosive action (and there's certainly plenty of it!).  This is an important reason why it's such a memorable movie, and why John McClane is such a memorable character.
Die Hard was such a popular movie that it spawned multiple sequels, and is still very well liked today.  So, what is it that sets John McClane apart from so many other action heroes?  It's that he's an average person like you or me.  John McClane isn't a crack shot like Rambo, and doesn't have any superhuman abilities like the Terminator.  Even though he has an extraordinary amount of confidence, he's just as terrified of the situation as any of the hostages involved.  He can't fire a machine gun expertly, he gets injured often, and he has to do all of this without shoes!  Bruce Willis uses these elements to create a brilliantly memorable hero.  Every heroic feat John McClane achieves feels that much more dramatic and exciting for the simple fact that he is like one of us.
As good as Bruce Willis is, he would be nothing without a great villain to play against.  Thankfully, Alan Rickman brings exactly the menace required to portray Hans Gruber.  From the moment he is on screen, Hans Gruber has a commanding presence.  Even before we know his motives, we know Gruber means business, and will never take no for an answer.  Gruber is a man who wants control, and as John McClane begins to alter the situation, he begins to lose control over his own reactions.  Alan Rickman plays out these tightly wound emotions beautifully.  We get a real sense of Gruber's frustration and boiling anger underneath his cool exterior.
Is Die Hard a good movie?  Absolutely.
Is Die Hard a Christmas movie?  It's entirely up to you!  

Doctor Strange (2016)

The latest in Marvel's ever-expanding film universe, Doctor Strange explores the magical side of the Marvel universe.  Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) is a gifted surgeon, but has an attitude on par with someone like Dr. Gregory House.  His only concern is maintaining his own renown in medicine and keeping up with his lavish lifestyle.  After his hands are badly damaged in a car accident, Strange is forced to search for alternatives to medicine to cure his ailment.  This search leads him to Nepal, where he learn the secrets of magic and mysticism under a mysterious woman known as The Ancient One (Tilda Swinton).  Meanwhile, Keacilius (Mads Mikkelsen), a former student of The Ancient One, has discovered forbidden knowledge and is acting on it in the most dangerous way.  Together with his teachers, and some clever manipulation of time and space, Doctor Strange must fight the forces of chaos in order to protect the Earth from the destructive entity known as Dormammu.
For comics fans and newcomers alike, Doctor Strange is a great entry in the Marvel filmography.  The story follows the fairly traditional path of classic Samurai films, with a bit of the fantastic added to the mix.  The plot may feel familiar to some, but it's so well done, only the most jaded of movie fans will feel bored by it.  Benedict Cumberbatch plays Doctor Strange very well.  Over the course of the film, we see him change from arrogant to angry, and finally to a man in command and control of himself.  His personal transformation is believable, and it's what drives this film forward.  In particular, his scenes with Rachel McAdams (as love interest Christine Palmer) illustrate this change of character fully.  During the scenes of Strange's training, Tilda Swinton also has some good moments as the wise master figure.
This film has a lot of very cleverly done visuals.  The 3D effects are particularly well executed, with many kaleidoscopic transformations of ordinary settings.  I'm not certain how well these effects translate to non-3D, but they were impressive in the format I saw them in.  One of the things I appreciated most as a comics fan was the film's depiction of Dormammu and his chaotic dimension.  They are shown in an abstract way, yet the evil they represent is made very clear.
Doctor Strange is a breath of fresh air for the Marvel movies, showing the audience something a little different than the usual super-science or simple fist-fighting heroes.  It will be interesting to see how Doctor Strange will fit into a team setting, although one of the post-credits scenes hints at a possible ally.  If you're a fan of the comics, or just bored with traditional superhero films, Doctor Strange is a great way to see a new side of the superhero genre.

Inferno (2016)

Based on the best selling book by Dan Brown, Inferno is the latest entry in Ron Howard's suspenseful film series.  This installment finds Professor Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) in an Italian hospital, victim of a mysterious head wound and amnesia.  Soon, a few pieces of a larger puzzle are revealed, as Langdon and his attending physician Sienna Brooks (Felicity Jones) are chased across Europe by police officers as well as agents of the W.H.O.  Add to this the mystery of a deceased billionaire with a dangerous philosophy, clues surrounding the work of the poet Dante, and a hidden biological weapon, and this becomes a recipe for danger-filled adventure.
One of the first things that struck me about Inferno was the departure in tone from previous films in this series.  The film immediately grabs you by the neck and shakes vigorously.  With some expertly done editing and makeup/effects work, Inferno displays a nightmarish world that is at once shocking and confusing, reflecting the current state of Robert Langdon himself.  After this, things calm down a bit, and we begin to see the different pieces of the puzzle that has been prepared for our hero.  Interestingly, this puzzle solving format only seems to last for about half of the movie.  After this, the characters become as puzzling as the clues that have been followed.  In fact, I found myself so wrapped up in piecing together the clues hidden in Renaissance paintings and art objects that some of the biggest plot reveals took me completely by surprise, which is exactly what this type of movie should deliver.  Director Ron Howard makes great use of authentic locations in the film, which makes for an incredibly beautiful viewing experience, as well as reinforcing the feeling of secret history being discovered.
For the most part, I found the cast did an excellent job.  However, I found the performance of Felicity Jones a little on the flat side.  It wasn't necessarily bad acting, but I felt that Sienna Brooks was simply there to facilitate the plot movement, and didn't feel like a fully rounded character to me.  That being said, the performance of Tom Hanks and the rest of the cast make up for it.  In particular, I enjoyed the work of Ana Ularu as a trigger-happy police officer, and Omar Sy as a determined W.H.O. agent.  Also, Irrfan Khan is worth a mention as the professionally dangerous company man, Harry Sims.
I don't remember the previous films in the series very clearly, so I'm sure a few moments were lost on me, but I still found Inferno accessible to an essentially new viewer.  There are only a few small callbacks, but it's enough to make one want to go back and watch the previous movies.  If you're into mystery, history, and suspense, Inferno is a perfect movie for you to check out!        

The First Three - Luke Cage (2016)

Statistics have shown that it takes a few episodes for a viewer to get hooked on any given series.  On average, the number of episodes is three. (thus my title) With this in mind, I welcome you to the first in a series in which I will review shows based on the first three episodes.  In this first edition, I'll be looking at the new Netflix original, Luke Cage.
To those unfamiliar with the character, Luke Cage (sometimes known as Power Man) is a Marvel Comics character who has been around since the 1970s.  The new Netflix series, produced by Marvel and ABC Studios, brings Luke Cage into the here and now, sharing the TV universe of other heroes like Daredevil and Jessica Jones.  Although Luke Cage's powers include super-strength and unbreakable skin, he tends to keep a low profile in the first episodes of this series.  This is in large part to the fact that Cage (Mike Colter) is a man who is running from his troubled past.  Luke does his best to live a quiet, trouble free life in Harlem while people like the gangster 'Cottonmouth' Stokes (Mahershala Ali) and his cousin Mariah (Alfre Woodard), a misguided, if not crooked politician, cause problems that end up affecting the whole neighbourhood.  When a violent tragedy strikes Pop's barber shop, the local social hub, (and one of Cage's workplaces) Luke realizes the impact crime is having on Harlem, and sets out to use his powers to make a lasting change for the city.
One of the most striking elements of Luke Cage is just how steeped in black culture the show truly is.  From background jazz or rap music to discussions of basketball and even black poets and writers, the show covers just about everything.  There were several references that I didn't understand, but this is one of the things that excites me about the show.  It gives me the feeling that the writers know what they're talking about, and that there is true authenticity in the dialogue.
Much of the black community has voiced their support of the show and its cast, though there is some divisiveness over the show's more political elements, such as the use of certain racial language, or Luke Cage's hoodie, a possible reminder of the Trayvon Martin case.  While these things may be uncomfortable for some, I feel that it's all done in the name of authenticity, and the shows writers and producers should be applauded for it.  The show acknowledges the daily issues I'm certain many black people face, while at the same time, not going the route of stereotyping.  From a writing standpoint, this is a difficult balancing act, but it has been done to perfection here, and the show deserves recognition for that alone.  
Another reason the show is so successful is the performance of Mike Colter in the iconic title role.  Colter's Luke Cage is soft spoken, yet powerful.  He will defend himself physically, but doesn't go out looking for trouble.  Throughout the series, we also get glimpses of Cage as a man conflicted by his past, and dealing with feelings of guilt.  Mike Colter brings great depth and seriousness to the character, and he's helped by an outstanding supporting cast.  The women of the series are especially compelling characters for me.  Simone Missick plays the street-smart detective Misty Knight with just the right balance of sharp wit and sex appeal.  Alfre Woodard's portrayal of Mariah is wonderfully complex.  It's clear from Woodard's performance that Mariah believes she is doing the right thing, even though she is doing it in the most unethical of ways.  In my opinion, she may be the most interesting character on the show after Luke Cage himself.
To sum up, Luke Cage is a show that will appeal to not only long time comic fans, but to people who are entirely new to the character.  It contains fantastic action sequences, as well as real human drama.  Luke Cage is great not only for its entertainment value, but is equally valuable for its social commentary.  If you haven't seen it yet, I highly recommend you try watching at least the pilot episode.  Even if it's not to your taste, it will certainly leave you with a few things to think about.

Snowpiercer (2013)

Snowpiercer takes place in the not-too-distant future, in a world where attempts to stop global warming have gone horribly wrong, and the Earth as we know it has been frozen solid.  What remains of humanity has been left to circle the globe (for generations) on a gargantuan train named Snowpiercer.  In the time the the train has been in operation, the system of government has become corrupt and murderous.  While passengers in the rear of the train are beaten and served slabs of black gelatin, the elite people towards the front are treated to the luxuries of steam baths and sushi. When low-class citizens Curtis (Chris Evans) and his friend Edgar (Jamie Bell) decide they've seen enough, they organize a revolutionary group to get to the front of the train in order to confront Wilford (Ed Harris), the mysterious figurehead and operator of Snowpiercer.  Along the way, they encounter both political and physical resistance, until they are finally faced with the monstrous realities of how the train operates, as well as being faced with an impossible choice that affects all the lives on board.
The production design of Snowpiercer is brilliant from top to bottom.  It makes great use of the techno-industrial ghetto aesthetic used in such films as the Matrix and Alien franchises.  Almost immediately, the film gives you a very clear sense of place.  This feeling also serves to reinforce the ideals of the characters.  We understand why they want out of the place they're in because we're shown how awful it is.
Equally important to this theming is the costume design.  The uniforms of the train guards call to mind soldiers of Nazi Germany.  Train overseer Mason (Tilda Swinton), on the other hand, wears clothing that would have been highly fashionable in the 1980s.  John Hurt's Gilliam wears patched, sooty clothing, concealing his artificial limbs, which are themselves cobbled together from canes and various scrap metal.  These costume choices are not only wonderfully made, but they solidify the idea of the class system, which is a key theme of the film.
Snowpiercer is just as well made behind the camera.  Director Joon-ho Bong (credited as Bong Joon Ho) brings a totally unique combination of techniques to this film.  Both the camera work and lighting seem to magnify the emotion of the actors, which makes the story all the more thrilling.
The acting is brilliant across the board.  Chris Evans is a picture of grim determination, in a performance which only gets more intense as we approach the ending.  Tilda Swinton displays a bureaucratic tyranny that might remind one of Margaret Thatcher's iron-clad vision for England in her time as Prime Minister.  While John Hurt's role has less screen time, he plays it with a depth and believability that is unmatched.  Also of note is Kang-ho Song as Namgoong Nimsoo, the drug addicted security expert who is drafted to get Curtis' team to the front of the train.
I was somewhat surprised at the amount of violence in Snowpiercer, but I found that it was well handled, if slightly graphic.  This approach to violence works in much the same way it does in Quentin Tarantino's Kill Bill.  The violence serves to drive the plot forward, as well as reinforce the grander themes in play.
Snowpiercer is a film with many faces.  You can watch it as a thoughtful art film, or simply as a great piece of sci-fi action.  It's thrilling in its originality, and in my opinion, it is one of the most smartest sci-fi films made in the past decade.  If you haven't seen it yet, do yourself a favour and check it out today!